Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Response to David Lead blog post

Response to Bridesmaids lead blog post
               That clip was completely the lowest type of humor, poop jokes.  The only real redeeming quality of the scene is that it is very up front about itself.  It does not try to hid the lowbrow nature of the joke.  This is both a good and bad thing.  It is a good thing because there is no deception going on but it does not help the joke.  The lack of cover means that creator of the scene, director and writers, didn’t care enough to even try to make the joke seem better.
               The setting of the joke does make incongruity a possible reason for the comedy, such as it is.  A better reason is superiority because its nicely dressed people being brought down to something everyone does.  This doesn’t improve the joke but it does more accurately represent the reasoning behind the joke.

               The difference between Bridesmaid poop humor and South Parks talking poop, other than comedy, is that South Park was using it to make fun of people who fight against Christmas.  South Park’s Mr. Hankey is an over the top of all the shit people spew out of their mouths when talking about the holidays and end all for holiday symbols.  This is due to him being a piece of poop that everyone, no matter the ethnicity or religion, will hate as a holiday symbol.  Mr. Hankey is a satire while the Bridesmaid scene is not even funny.  

2 comments:

  1. I agree with you. Just because poop is involved doesn't necessarily mean it's poop humor. I have to disagree with what you said about Bridesmaids though. I think the over the top nature of the scene is used intentionally. Its supposed to provide contrast to the nature of the store. It also highlights the difference between Annie and Helen's styles. It also plays against the other half of the scene, as Helen quietly torments Annie out in the fitting room.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It could be considered a kind of social satire--not simply just mocking fancy stores by showing that they can be brought down to the low level, but as Thomas was saying showing the way that friends will torment one another in these settings. I think the effectiveness of it for those who find it amusing lies not simply in the gross aspect but in the way that this gross factor seems to parody the typical "mean girls" behavior.

    ReplyDelete